Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fluffy (song) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Wolf Alice. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Fluffy (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't seem to be notable. In the previous AfD, everyone voted delete, and the article was eventually moved to userspace and deleted as U1. Stefan2 (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect to band the only thing that has changed since the last AfD where there was insufficient sourcing for a stand alone article is that the article for the band itself now exists and is fairly established as meeting N and as such is an appropriate landing page for a redirect. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:25, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect and revert the band article back to including the full details of the single, making this article redundant. --Michig (talk) 06:10, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.